In fact, there
are economically important land and lake management implications that
derive from these data in terms of how to most efficiently restore
the degraded water quality in Halsteds Bay. Restorative management
decisions involving millions of dollars of tax monies are currently
being discussed for Halsteds Bay. Such storm-related events were suspected,
but prior to our RUSS data, were not documented due to their transient
nature and the danger of manual sampling during severe weather. In
fact, several of these events were observed in August 1999 (see figures
below) and again in August and September 2000.
In
each case, temperature profiles didn't tell us the state of mixing
of the bay since variations from surface to bottom were only about
1oC. However, dissolved oxygen (and to a lesser extent pH and EC25)
clearly indicated that the lower half (~5 m) of the water column
dramatically changed from extreme anoxia (no oxygen) to >75% saturation
and then back again to anoxia over intervals of ~ 24 hours in mid
and late August/early September. During the initial mixing, the
influx of anoxic water to the "epilimnion" actually decreased the
level of DO to ~5 mg/L, which could potentially harm fish communities.
In addition, water samples collected on August 25, about 10 days
after the first mixing event, showed that about 3200 kg (over 7000
lbs of P) was suddenly injected into the upper sunlit euphotic zone.
This represented an areal phosphorus load of about triple the annual
load estimated to enter Halsteds Bay from Six Mile Creek, its major
tributary. The sudden input of P appears to have then caused an
increase in algal growth, seen as a chlorophyll increase over the
same manual monitoring interval (Barten and Vlach 1999, L. Minnetonka
Annual Monitoring Report). Recall that 7000 lbs of P can potentially
lead to over 3,500,000 lbs of algae !
These
new data, that would likely not have been acquired without remote
sensing, suggest that water quality in nutrient enriched lakes of
intermediate depth (perhaps 5-10 meters) may often be controlled
by weather events. The data also indicate that watershed Best Management
Practices (BMPs), alone, may not be successful in improving the
water quality of these bays without concurrently reducing internal,
in-lake P-loading. Of course this does not diminish the importance
of preventing increases in external P-loading from old and new developments
over the long-term. However, it does offer important insights into
the cost-effective management of water quality for 6 bays on the
west and north end of the lake that have shown significant downward
trends in water quality over the past 5 years.
|